Inner city redevelopment and regeneration – London’s Dockland case study

* During nineteenth century, London was the busiest port of the world. But payable to changes such as better technology, they became abandoned and rheumatoid.* Larger ships could not nettle the port and containerization did away with the need of large number of dockers.* By that duration the bea had very few jobs, the docks had closed and over half of the realm was derelict, many of the houses needed urgent repair, expect was poor and there was a lack of basic services, leisure amenities and open space.* The London Docklands cultivation Corporation (LDDC) tried to improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area.Changes Physical derelict land reclaimed, corners planted, open space created and conservation areas created. Economic alter transport systems means faster journey. Improvements in roads. Employment and businesses increased e.g. The Guardian and day-to-day Telegraph. High tech firms came due to the low rates of the enterprise zone. These were f ollowed by firms wishing to relocate in upstart office blocks. Social much than 20 000 cornerstones created. Former docks converted into luxury flats. Large, modern shopping complexes built. other activities such as marina for water sports and indoor sports centre built. Several areas vindicated and converted into parks and area of open space. Almost 100 million pounds has also been spent of health, education, training and community programmes.Reasons for successYou can adopt also Costco Case Study* Extremely high prices of land for new offices and residential development.* The potential of leisure activities and scenic views along the riverside.* Funding of round of the infrastructure by the government.* Initiatives taken by entrepreneurs like John Mowlem, whose party built the London City Airport.* The development of the Dockland Light Railway.* The setting up of the Isle of Dogs Enterprise zone to attract industry.* The development of the airport transport easy journeys .Groups involved in this* local anaesthetic housing societies helped by gaining home improving grants.* The local Newham council built affordable houses and improved local services.* The LDDC were responsible for planning and redeveloping dockland.* The national government created enterprise zone with its reduced rate. It back up private investment and improved transport systems.* Property developers were responsible for edifice large office blocks and converting derelict warehouses into luxury flats.* Conservation groups supported tree planting and other schemes.Opinions? School leaver happy because there are more new jobs available.? Local shopkeepers happy because they will have wealthier customers.? Local retired people poorly, because the prices in the area rise sharply.? Former docker bad because no appropriate manual jobs created.? Social worker bad because local community is broken by newcomers.? Elderly bad because there is no sufficient services such as hospitals.? L ocal people bad, they valued jobs and affordable houses.? People living in Birmingham happy as their houses were improved along with new facilities provided with them.Nupur Jain 5F Geography case study