Anthropology of humor Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Anthropology of pique - Assignment ExampleHumor is a part of our day-to-day behavior and people use fancy while conversing, imagining, and observing. Humor is also beneficial as it gives amicable, psychological, and material advantages to the persons who get ahead humor. Humor is soothing for pain, grief, anxiety, and nervousness. Mcgraw and Warren be of the view that humor is a positive and adaptive answer to benign violations. Humor provides a healthy and socially beneficial way to react to hypothetical threats, international concerns, minor setbacks, social faux pas, cultural misunderstandings, and other benign violations people encounter on a regular basis. Humor also serve wells a valuable communicative entertainmentction (1148). Humor whatever whitethorn it be is not innocent it reveals as much as it hides. Also, humor does not actually enhance assault, it is not unrelated to aggression. Gruner, Humor and Aggression There have been so many attempts by philosophers, scientists, unfavourable theorists, and comedians to theorize humor and delineate its intricacies. There are several theories, which try to interpret humor. What is humor? What is its social function? What ought to be considered as humor? Humor theorists have tried to find answers to all the supra questions and beyond. These theories try to understand all sorts of humor by assuming some antecedents, like incongruity, tension free (Freud) or superiority (Gruner). However, the problem with them is that they speculate humor as an outcome of some tragedies. According to Gruner, prostitution could serve as the subject matter in a joke in order to make fun of others besides the girl and her client (122). Humor, even it is on some people only, is unceasingly related to the ships company as a whole. Therefore, humor could reveal the social unconscious and the traces of repressed aggression within it. many times, apparently, the subject matter is sex of humor, but the object of ridicule the conceited reputation of both a young man and a young woman (italics original) (Gruner, 126). Certainly, humor is an attack, a rebellion against the conceited nature of transactions in a non-transparent society. Charles R Gruner has offered a deep-going superiority theory of humor. He has contributed a percentage in conceptualizing the humor. The central theme of Gruners theoretical formulation regarding the complexities of humor is that much inner humor is can also profit in humorousness by its active ingredient of aggression. That is, if both aggression and sexual content each make for good jokes, a combination of the two adds up to triplex enjoyment. (emphasis original) (127). He equates humor with a game and firmly believes that there are winners, losers, and spectators in humor. Gruner is of the view that sexual humor is one of the most prevalent and best-enjoyed kinds of humor (127). Gruners Superiority Theory of Humor has three natural assumptions. First, in the entir e humorous situation there will be a winner and a loser. This notion is compatible with the human nature. Gruner believes that human beings are always competitive in their mind. In addition, humor has substituted the actual fight. Through humor people are competing with each other for hundreds of years. The winner, in Gruners notion, always makes fun of the loser. If we go to any talk show there we find comedians, who winners, making fun of politicians and elites, who are considered as losers.