Elderly Care: Proposal on Hospital Admittance and Discharge

Elderly Care Proposal on Hospital Admittance and DischargeA proposal of channel to improve the quality of deal for vulnerable older people who after being admitted into hospital and on arc do not boast a lot of pickax in services that they receive. They are either sent home with a care packet which does not meet all guides of the older person or moved to a residential home.It has been said that independence and mobility are the two close precious commodities that the elderly, as a group, need to nurture as a significant decline in either will significantly increase their dependence and reliance on others, either in the family or in the community. (Whitely, S. et al 1996)In general name, the plight of the elderly in hospital is probably the most precarious of all of the age ranges, irrespective of the illness for which they were admitted. Any figure of debilitating pathology, even if it only puts them in bed for a few days, may very well weaken their already tenuous grip on independence. The result may be either a prolonged stay in a hospital bed, home discharge with a care package which may not be totally satis party and all too often dependent on the ministrations of a group of overstretched healthcare professionals, or discharge to some form of residential care which, although possibly seen by some as being the best option for the debilitated or infirm elderly, has an wide impact on both the independence and the disembodied spiritstyle of the elderly person.Let us briefly consider this last option which is not as dead on target forward an option as may appear at first sight. Let us personalise the discussion by referring to a hypothetically shell Mrs J., a 78 yr. old lady who has lived alone since her husband died some ten years previously. She is fiercely independent scarcely has been getting progressively to a greater extent frail as the years have gone by to the extent that it is a struggle to get her shopping. As a result her diet is be seeming progressively more inadequate.Her personal hygiene, which was meticulous a few years ago, is now overly failing, and she spends a great deal of her time alone and in bed. She has developed a low grade chest infection which required her to spend three days in hospital. When it came time to discharge her, her daughter could not look after her and took the decision that she would be better in a residential home. Mrs.J. had virtually no choice in the matter and on the quartern day she found herself in a residential home, surrounded by people with an average age earlier greater than hers, many of whom were suffering from alter degrees of dementia.The home had a completely imposed and inflexible regime which was a major imposition on her as she had previously been able to do what she wanted when she wanted. There was virtually no privacy and never a time, day or night, when there was silence or quiet. Her house had to be sold to even off the fees, so she knew that there was n o possibility that she would ever go home again and any money that she had, she was not able to spend as her nest egg were also taken to pay the fees. In the space of four days her life had been overturned and although she was warm, fed and cared for, by any rationalisation her quality of life had changed for ever.Mrs.J. is quoted as being fairly typical of many and her possibility used to illustrate the enormity of the life changing impact of admission to a residential home.Critically examination the need for the proposed changeThe particular change that we shall highlight in this particular essay is the need for multidisciplinary discharge planning, a move which is highlighted in the field redevelopment Frame bunk for the elderly (Standard Two).As we shall discuss later in this essay, the National Service Frameworks have been conceived and drafted in response to the perceived need for change. It therefore follows that it is a self-serving argument that it is a recognition of a need for change in this area that has prompted its inclusion in the National Service Framework .This rather tautological argument is given credence by a number of studies that have both looked at, and demonstrated the need for change in this area.The paper by Richards (et al 1998) was a first rate examination of the problem. It covered a number of areas, but, with specific relevance to our considerations here it highlighted how the patient upshot could be improved by a timely multidisciplinary pre-discharge esteemment by a team which included social workers.This paper, if nothing else, underlines the need for change and provides a model for how improvements in the multidisciplinary discharge function can produce potential benefits for patientsEvidence to support this view can be found in anyone of a number of recently published papers ( such as gammon C 2004) which has specifically surveyed patient and carer satisfaction levels in the area of welfare and associated services afte r hospital discharge for the elderly.An outline and critical discussion of how change can be implementedChange can be a trophic factor in any organisation but no matter how good the intentions and aspirations, if it is badly managed, then the end result can be a harmful mess. One only has to consider the debacle of the implementation of the Griffiths Report (Griffiths Report 1983) in the NHS in the 80s to appreciate how a major management change could be badly implemented. The Government even set up its own commission to see what lessons could be learned from the episode. (Davidmann 1988)If we consider the overall implications of the report in terms of change management, the innovations failed because they were imposed rather than managed. (Davidmann 1988)Another fundamental idea in the field of change management is expressed by Marinker (1997) who points to the rather subtle dispute between compliance and concordance. He suggests that human beings generally respond better to sug gestion, reason and coercion rather than direct imposition of arbitrary change.The management of change is perhaps the most critical of the elements in this discussion. There is little point in having vision or ideas if you cannot success mounty implement them into reality (Bennis et al 1999).The totally study of the Management of Change is built upon a set of constructs known as the General Systems Theory (GST). (Newell et al 1992). The process is both general and universal and can be summarised in the phrase Unfreezing, Changing and Refreezing or in simple terms, assessing a situation changing it, and then making the changes stick. (Thompson 1992).All changes, but particularly health and welfare related ones, should only really be made after careful consideration of the evidence base underpinning that change (Berwick D 2005). In specific terms one should evaluate the need for implementation of a multidisciplinary discharge procedure by considering the evidence that the current s ituation could be improved, make managers aware of the findings of need and than be proactive in encouragement in terms of support of any decisions that are made to implement such moves.The Political contextIf one considers the pre-2000 structure and organisation of the NHS, one could come to the conclusion that there were three major problems which, some observers stated were not reconciled with what was required of a 21st century care provider, namelya lack of national standardsold-fashioned demarcations between staff and barriers between servicesa lack of clear incentives and levers to improve performanceover-centralisation and disempowered patients. (Nickols 2004)There have been a number of reforms in the NHS which potentially impinge on the cases of the dependent elderly. Arguably the most important was the NHS fancy (DOH 2000). This is a lengthy document which calls for some fundamental changes in the working practices, and in some cases the actual roles of a number of healt hcare professionals.An analytical assessment would have to conclude that, although there is a lot of tip in some areas of the plan, there is actually comparatively little detail in just how these changes should be actioned and arguably even less detail in what it expected the changes to be (Krogstad et al 2002). In the context of our discussion here, we should also note the natural ideological successor to the NHS Plan, was the Agenda for Change (2004). The National Service Frameworks were then introduced after seminal guidance from the National Institute for clinical Excellence (NICE 2004)The other reforms that have a military capability on our considerations are Choosing wellness making healthier choices easier (2004) and Building on the exceed (2003). Both of these have considerable implications for the care of the elderly. The Choosing Health paper outlines the Government proposals for giving patients greater choice in the implementation of their health care and Building on t he Best examines ways of improving and modifying current practices. There are specific references to the discharge procedures which are relevant to our discussions here.The Health contextIn the context of this essay the NHS Plan called for a number of reforms includingIncrease support and reformAim to redress geographical inequalities,Improve service standards,Extend patient choice.Each of these areas has a bearing our Mrs.J. The geographical inequalities were primarily due to the historical context in which each area had implemented their own services together with the balance between funding and demand in each area. The improvement in service standards is mainly driven by the National Service Frameworks and he extension of patient choice cl ahead of time has a bearing on Mrs.J. although the choices available may well be less in practical terms than the complete spectrum of what is actually available and may well be constrained by factors such as available funding and the patients own physical state. (Wierzbicki et al 2001)The National Service Frameworks (amongst other things) sets out to reduce inequalities in service provision between providers and also to set standards of excellence, together with goals and targets that are nationally based rather than locality based. (Rouse et al 2001).National Service Framework Standard Two has as its stated aim toEnsure that older people are tough as individuals and that they receive appropriate and timely packages of care which meet their needs as individuals, regardless of health and social services boundaries.It is formulated within the concept of Person Centred Care. This is intended to allow the elderly (and their carers) to feel entitled to be treated as individuals, and to allow them to be responsible for their own choices about(predicate) their own care.The Social Care contextIf we accept that a patients discharge from hospital is dependent on many disparate and variable factors including (apart from their o bvious health considerations), for example, their financial, dependence and support network status. It therefore follows that before a considered decision can be made to discharge the patient, a full and careful assessment of these various aspects should ideally be made. (Gould et al. 1995). The input of the social worker to the multidisciplinary pre-discharge team is therefore vital in this respect as it is supposed(prenominal) that other healthcare professionals will be in a position to make an assessment of all of these factors.If one reads contemporary peer reviewed literature on the subject, the term seamless interface is a concept that frequently appears. (Dixon et al 2003). This reflects the moves towards the dismantling of the Empire concept of each health and welfare related subspecialty. (Lee et al 2004). And the positive integration of each, for the overall benefit of the patient.Central to this process is the advent of the Single Assessment Process (SAP) which is arguab ly the most important new work practice to facilitate good multidisciplinary working practices. This reduces the duplication of work, derivation of facts and paperwork that hitherto was commonplace (Fatchett A. 1998).In specific consideration of our Mrs.J. we could find that she was visited by one constituent of the discharge team (typically the social worker), and an assessment of all of the factors that we have discussed could be made and recorded in a single central document or reference point (computer). It is the stated aim of the SAP that the needs and wishes of the elderly patient will quell at the heart of the whole process. (Mannion R et al 2005)To consider the requirements of the National Service Frameworks and in the context of social work we should also mention the concept of the carers or patients ally that has been specifically encouraged. (Bartley M. 2004). These are designated workers (often specially trained or experienced social workers), who would stand up for the need of the patient or their carers. In Mrs.J.s case we could postulate that such a champion could assess her needs as being more appropriately dealt with by an intensive course of both physiotherapy and an occupational therapy input rather than necessarily being arbitrarily placed in a residential home.The social worker is ideally placed to assess and indeed to action interventions such as that of the occupational therapist, who can be shown to produce considerable impact on the ability of the infirm elderly to remain at home. (Gilbertson et al 2000). We should not leave this area without a demonstration that the evidence base in this area of social worker input as being both positive and beneficial by quoting the Logan paper (et al 1997)ReferencesAgenda for Change, 23 November 2004,Government White PaperHMSO 2004Bartley M. (2004),Health Inequality. An Introduction to Theories, Concepts and Methods.Cambridge University coerce 2004Bennis, Benne Chin (Eds.) 1999,The Planning o f Change (2nd Edition)..Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1999.Berwick D 2005 Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine Qual. Saf. Health Care, Oct 2005 14 315 316.Building on the best 2003, plane section of HealthHMSO London 09/12/2003Choosing Health making healthier choices easier 2004Government White Paper,HMSO London 16.11.2004Davidmann 1988,Reorganising the National Health Service An Evaluation of the Griffiths Report,HMSO London 1988Dixon, Holland, and Mays 2003 primary feather care core values Developing primary care gatekeeping, commissioning, and managed care BMJ, Jul 2003 317 125 128.DOH 2000,NHS Plan,HMSO London 2000Fatchett A. (1998),Nursing in the new NHS Modern, Dependable.London Bailliere TindallGilbertson, gibe Langhorne, Andrew Walker, Ann Allen, and Gordon D Murray 2000 Domiciliary occupational therapy for patients with stroke discharged from hospital randomised controlled trial BMJ, Mar 2000 320 603 606 doi10.1136/bmj.320.7235.603Gould MM, Iliffe S. 1995,Hospital at home a case study in service development.Br J Health Care Manage 1995 1 809-812.Griffiths Report 1983NHS Management Inquiry Report DHSS, 1983 Oct 25Ham C. (2004),Health Policy in Britain 5th ed.Basingstoke Palgrave MacmillanKrogstad, Dag Hofoss, and Per Hjortdahl 2002 Continuity of hospital care beyond the question of personal contact BMJ, Jan 2002 324 36 38.Lee, Wong, Yeung Wong, and Tsang 2004 Interfacing between primary and tributary care is needed BMJ, Aug 2004 329 403.Logan PA, Gladman JRF, Lincoln NB. 1997,A randomised controlled trial of enhanced social service occupational therapy for stroke patients.Clin Rehab 1997 11 107-113Mannion R, Davies H, Marshall M (2005)Cultures for proceeding in Health Care. Maidenhead Open University PressMarinker M.1997,From compliance to concordance achieving shared goals,BMJ 19973147478.Newell Simon. 1992,Human Problem Solving.Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1992.NICE 2004,Management guidelines NHS DirectiveHMSO, Tuesday 7 declination 2004Nickols F 2004,Change Management 101 A Primer,London Macmillian 2004Richards, Joanna Coast, David J Gunnell, Tim J Peters, John Pounsford, and Mary-Anne Darlow 1998 Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness and acceptability of an early discharge, hospital at home scheme with acute hospital care BMJ, Jun 1998 316 1796 1801Rouse, Jolley, and Read 2001 National service frameworks BMJ, Dec 2001 323 1429.Thompson 1992,Organisations in Action.McGraw-Hill, New York 1992.Whitely,S. et al (1996)Health and Social Care Management,Basingstoke Macmillan.Wierzbicki and Reynolds 2001 National service frameworks financial implications are huge BMJ, Sep 2001 321 705.PDG