Outline of the Final Lab Report Essay

*This template get out provide you with the detail necessary to begin a quality Final mental testing ground Report. usage this template to complete the Week 3 Outline of the Final Lab Report and ensure that you atomic number 18 providing tout ensemble of the necessary instruction and fitting format for the assignment. Before you begin, please note the following important information1. Carefully review the Final Lab Report instructions in the beginning you begin this assignment2. The Final Lab Report should cover each 3 essays from your Week Two Lab3. As you plan your final examination paper, think about how you plunder combine these laboratories to tell a fact-based spirit level about wet quality. For manakin, consider how your experiments can be linked to issues at pee treatment plants or the arrive of bottled irrigate people purchase.4. For further help see the Sample Final Lab Report for an example of a final product on a antithetical topic.5. You may solely replace the text following the bold terms with the earmark outline information to complete this assignment. Make sure to pay conclude attention to the information called for and provide all necessary material.Title psychiatric hospital body split 1 Background All flourishing, hygienic and well-heeled communities all perplex one thing in common and that is sponge peeing, free of harmful contaminants because our bodies depend on divest, pure piss system to survive. As maintained in Mishra, S., & Nandeshwar, S. (2013), piss is crucial for the well-being of people. Due to industrialization, ripeningpopulation , illiteracy the provision of safe inebriation irrigate will undergo global indust in near time to come(pg. 599, para 5). In view of the fact that many diseases and viruses can be transmitted though irrigate, dirty/ colly water is extremely hazardous and it negatively impacts our health and the health of all living things. Water quality is influenced naturally wit h mode switchs for instance, and by our actions. Unfortunately we take for grantedt clearly see the Brobdingnagian distresss that our negligent behavior is causing. In turn it leads us to incorrectly assume that water must be resistant to pollution damage and that we waste an everlasting show of clean, drinkable water at our disposal.This is wherefore we should all try to create awareness on water pollution, organize ourselves and others in our community to recognize and accept the fact that water pollution threatens our health, our lives and consequently our existence. Water quality research is very important to our friendship because it gives us insight on contaminant issues, brings up awareness and allows us to learn preventative measures. As give tongue to in Broderick, K. (2008), The importance of work out and participation for adaptive management suggests that success can be judged in terms of learning outcomes (pg. 303, para 1). Our drinking water can be contam inated and we might not even realize it, because of all the contaminants that are transported through water regular evaluation of septic systems should be involve in all towns/counties around the country. As stated in Gunnarsdottir, M. J., Gardarsson, S. M., & Andradottir, H. O. (2013), insobriety water contamination, leading to waterborne diseases, is a recurrent event worldwide.A recent determine established that much than one out of all collar water borne outbreaks in affluent nations was caused by sewage contamination in ground water (pg. 1114, para 2-3). In this study, drinking water was well-tried and indeed it did show signs of contamination testing positive for norovirus. thereof demanding periodic septic systems evaluations in every town should be mandated. bole Paragraph 2 Objective How do we know if our drinking water is in fact contaminated? What can we do to prevent our water from harming our family members? These are just a couple of concerns and questions t hat you may ask yourself. The endeavor is to inform society of the importance of having a write out of clean, free of contaminants race appearance water in their community. Additionally, to be able to recognize the significance of acme awareness on water, forinstance to be aware of what helps maintain or improve the quality of water and what env conjuremental and human behaviors puts the quality of our water at risk for contamination. In view of the fact that we depend on water for survival, water pollution is an env weighmental issue that shouldnt be looked over.Body Paragraph 3 HypothesesHypotheses test 1Oil guessing = the water would probably change consistency, probably thicken up and change color Vinegar theory = the water would probably stay the alike color if the vinegar is white but there will be a change in heart Laundry detergent shot = the water will change in consistency and would probably obtain suds/bubbles, smell and color (if detergent is colored) would a lso be altered.Hypotheses test 2When I tried to filtrate the water to remove the contaminants, I am not completely successful because the water is not c% contaminant free since the water has a rancid smell.Hypotheses Experiment 3If bottled water is supposed to be free of contaminants, and then bottled water should block off significantly less contaminants than whang water because that is why bottled water is change to the public.Materials and MethodsBody Paragraph 1Experiment 1 effects of Groundwater befoulmentIn order to know if s cover is capable of actually removing contaminants from our drinking water I used three ordinary items that one port or another end up dissolving and polluting our water supply they are oil, vinegar and laundry detergent. Aside from using the three pollutants I used a permanent marker for labeling, soil, a displace, cheesecloths and of course water. front I labeled a total of eight beakers and divided them into ii groups of four. I filled fou r beakers (1-4) with 100 ml of water then I added to beakers 2-4 with 10 ml, oil, vinegar and detergent, aft(prenominal) mixing what I incorporate into the water I watched to see if any physical changesoccurred and smelled the solution. I illustrious what I observed for each beaker and proceeded with the experiment. Next I lined the funnel with cheesecloth and placed 60 ml of soil in it. I took beaker 5 and poured the contents of beaker 1 into the cheesecloth lined and soil covered funnel and I let it stand for about one minute and observed what happened to the water after it was filtered. I performed this same process for the rest of the beakers.Experiment 2 Water TreatmentTo determine if a filtering method is as potent as it is believe to be. The essential materials that I used in this experiment were potting soil, sand activated charcoal, gravel, alum, funnel, cheesecloth, blanching agent, and a stopwatch. First I made a solution of 100 ml soil and 200 ml water and this was labeled as the contaminated water of which 10 ml was come in aside. I let the solution sit and lined a funnel with cheesecloth and poured some sand, activated charcoal, and gravel. Next I poured in some clean water for a number of four generation and this is how I change integrity the filter. I poured in some of the contaminated water into the filter after five proceedings it was considered as filtered water and a couple of drops of bleach were added to the water as well. Now it was time to bring about a coincidence between the water that I just manually filtered with the 10 ml of contaminated water I had set aside and noted the differences.Experiment 3 Drinking Water QualityIn this experiment I tested the water quality of two different types of bottled water and water from the tip. I used Dasani and Fiji brands as my bottled water and water from the tap. Ammonia, chloride, 4 in 1 test strips, phosphate and iron test strips and most significantly a stopwatch. I used all of t he test strips I was provided with in the different types of water and recorded my findings. Some of the strips I used tested for ammonia, chloride, phosphate and iron in both bottled and tap waters.Body Paragraph 10 mg/L ammonia and chloride were found in both bottled and tap water. In the 4 in 1 test strips tap water had a ph of 2, alkalinity 0,2 mg/L, chlorine 40 mg/L, clumsiness of 0 mg/L, phosphate 0 ppm and iron 0 ppm. Dasani bottled water had a ph level of 1, alkalinity, chlorine and huskiness all measured 0 mg/L and phosphate and iron both measured 0 mg/L. Fiji bottled water had a ph of 8, alkalinity measured 10.0 mg/L, chlorine measured 40 mg/L, rigor 120 mg/L, phosphate measured 50 mg/L and iron 0 mg/L. DiscussionBody Paragraph 1 HypothesesThe hypothesis in experiment 1 was confirmed because after all of my observations the water mixed with the contaminants did react the way I envisioned they would. Changes in smell, color and composition occurred when I mixed water w ith each of the three contaminants and even after filtration contamination was still present. Disposing of contaminants such as oil should be done so correctly. Hypothesis 2 was confirmed because I predicted correctly when I stated that the water was going to produce traces of contamination even if it was filtered. However, Im going to have to deny hypothesis 3, I was wrong when I thought that bottled water was more promising to be less contaminated then tap water. When bottled water Fiji showed to have more contaminants then tap water with a higher phosphate, ph, alkalinity, hardness and the same amount of chlorine as tap water I knew that my hypotheses was wrong.Body Paragraph 2 ContextThe billion dollar bottled water industry suggests that bottled water is the best option however in my personal opinion and after performing experiment 3 I dont think its worth it to buy bottled water. Considering that thereisnt much of a a difference between bottled water Dasani and tap water, plus bottled water Fiji even showed to have higher contaminants than tap water. For example, it had phosphate 50 ppm while tap water had 0 ppm. As stated in Potera, C. (2002), Over half of Americans drink bottled water spending 240-10,000 times more per gallon for bottled water than they do for tap water, a motion largely fueled by the belief that bottled water is safer and healthier than tap water. Is the cost worth it? Controversial reports from the World Wide Fund for Natrure (WWF) in Gland, Switzerland, and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) in Washington, DC, say no (pg. 76, para 1).Body Paragraph 3 Variables and Future ExperimentsIn Experiment 1 Effects of Groundwater Contamination the possible factors that could have possibly busheled my results would be the timing. For instance, if I had waited a little bit more instead of smelling and discover immediately when I mixed the water with the detergent, oil and vinegar could it have made a difference? I could contro l this by postponement the ideal time and carefully timing everything with a stopwatch. I can also test this by doing the experiment and waiting at different times, for instance I can wait one minute, three minutes and five minutes. With experiment 1 I was able to recognize that contaminants that flow into the water are capable of causing consequences that can possibly affect our health. In Experiment 2 Water Treatment, the outcome indicated that filtered water isnt 100% free of contaminants. Perhaps if I extended the filtration process the contaminated water might have been clearer. Some possible factors that mightve unnatural the final result would be how contaminated the tap water in my area is and the state of health that I was in.For instance, if I had a bleak my sense of smell would not be as potent as they would be if I were cold-free. I could control this in the future by first investigating if my towns tap water isnt extremely contaminated. Also, if I was sick I could a sk someone else to smell the solution to get more accurate results. In Experiment 3 we were able to determine that bottled water isnt as safe and healthy as it is perceived to be. The possible factor that couldve affected the accuracy of the results is thetiming, if I went over/under the time that was indicated to check the strip for the end result. I could control this by being attentive and careful and making use of the stopwatch that was provided. We know that contaminants are present in our water, so we learn it daily. Is it harmful or irrelevant? We can test this by giving groups of people the same water (tap water from their town) for a predetermined amount of time and then evaluate them. Does one group have more energy than the other? Is anyone experiencing any discomfort? dIf so, how could you control for these in the future? You should also propose some new questions that have arisen from your results and what kind of experiment might be proposed to answer these questions .ConclusionsBody Paragraph 1The mark point of experiment 1 is that we should be more cautious with the way we discard our food and products because they can be contaminating our drinking water. In experiment 2 the key point is there is a grand difference between contaminated and treated water, the filtration process is five move long and even then contaminants may still be present. In experiment 3 the key point for me was that tap water isnt as bad and unsafe as it is perceived to be, the bottled water franchise is definitely deceiving. The main message that I would like people to have from this report is that they can make a difference and that by simply changing one of their behaviors and making it more greener, this possibly can make a difference in their water quality.ReferencesBroderick, K. (2008). Adaptive Management for Water Quality Improvement in the Great Barrier Reef Catchments schooling on the Edge. Geographical Research, 46(3), 303-313. doi10.1111/j.1745-5871.2008. 00525.x Gunnarsdottir, M. J., Gardarsson, S. M., & Andradottir, H. O. (2013). Microbial contamination in groundwater supply in a cold climate and coarse soil content study of norovirus outbreak at Lake Mvatn, Iceland. HydrologyResearch, 44(6), 1114-1128. doi10.2166/nh.2013.076 Mishra, S., & Nandeshwar, S. (2013). A study to assess water source sanitation, water quality and water cerebrate practices at household level in rural Madhya Pradesh. National daybook Of Community Medicine, 4(4), 599-602. Potera, C. (2002). The Price of Bottled Water. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(2), A 76. SCI207.W2.LabReportingForm